The
First question that my blog readers may ask me is why did I choose the name of
'Slave of Abu Lulu'?
Before
answering that question, I’d like to introduce Abu Lulu for you, and explain to
you who is him? And what he did?
Abu
Lulu (as) was a Persian Muslim, who killed
the tyrant Omar bin Al-Khattab (la). Most of Bakris (i.e. the so-called: Ahlus Sunna) claim that Abu Lulu
was a Zoroastrian. They do not have any proof of that, but they are fascinated
by Omar, and their fascination leads them to propagate lies.
The
first proof is that Abu Lulu was a Muslim is that when he had killed Omar, he
was in Holy Medina and inside the Prophet’s Mosque (Which it’s well-known as
Al-Masjid Al-Nabawi), and in that period non-muslim were not allowed to enter
the Prophet’s Mosque, so if Abu Lulu was a Zoroastrian, then how the Muslims
allowed him to enter the Mosque?
The
second proof is that Lulu (the daughter of Abu
Lulu) was a Muslim and speaks about Islam and the Bakris-scholars approve that
and they narrated that in their books. For example, you can refer to ‘Musannaf
al-San’ani’ by Abdul-Razzak Al-San’ani in which he said:
“Then he came (Ubaydallah bin Omar) to the daughter of Abu Lulu, and she
is a little girl who used to speak about Islam and then he killed her...etc”.
(Musannaf al-San’ani, volume 5, page 479)
The
third proof is that Al-Dhahabi who is one of their
greatest scholars claims that Abu Lulu was a Christian. In his book ‘s’ he
said: “He was a Christian slave for Al-Mughayra bin Sho’ba”. ()
Their
lies caused that contradiction, so that sometimes they claim that he was a
Christian and sometimes a Zoroastrian. And he wasn’t a Christian nor a
Zoroastrian, instead he was a Muslim and a real believer.
And
according to some Shi’ite references Abu Lulu he was promised paradise by Imam
Ali (as). (Al-Hidaya al-Kubra, by Al-Khosaybi, page 162)
